[Physical Activity Promotion in Exercise Therapy in Medical Rehabilitation: Consequences of the Nationwide Survey for Quality Development]. / Bewegungsförderliche Bewegungstherapie in der medizinischen Rehabilitation: Konsequenzen der bundesweiten Bestandsaufnahme für die Qualitätsentwicklung.

AIM: This article aims to summarize the status quo of exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation with regard to the establishment of the biopsychosocial understanding of health with a special focus on physical activity promotion; based on this, consequences for the optimization of exercise therapy are derived. METHODOLOGY: A three-step procedure was chosen, which builds on the elaboration of quality dimensions and quality-relevant areas of physical activity promotion in exercise therapy: 1.) the analysis of the current status quo of exercise therapy with regard to the quality-relevant characteristics. This is based on the current results from the project "Exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation: a national survey at facility and practitioner level" (BewegtheReha); 2.) the elaboration of optimization potential and 3.) the derivation of consequences for the systematic quality development of exercise therapy. RESULTS: We analyzed the status quo of exercise therapy for the following areas: Assessment and information gathering, targets and impact areas, therapeutic contents, working methods and implementation, therapy control as well as allocation to exercise therapy (step 1). The results show that the physical activity promoting potential of exercise therapy within medical rehabilitation has not yet been optimally exploited. In particular, there is a need for more interdisciplinarity, more patient orientation, therapeutic work on the basis of theory- and evidence-based biopsychosocial therapy concepts with stronger manualization and standardization (step 2). Starting points for quality improvement can be found at the therapist level as well as at the program level and the system level. The derived recommendations for quality improvement of physical activity promotion in exercise therapy (step 3) refer to three levels: a) human resource development, e. g. with regard to improved use and quality of the education system, b) organizational development, e. g. promotion of interprofessional cooperation, and c) provision of resources, e. g. access to information. CONCLUSION: The derived consequences form the basis for the systematic further development and optimization of physical activity in exercise therapy in the context of medical rehabilitation. Based on the results, next steps for improving quality of exercise therapy with a focus on the goal of physical activity promotion can be identified and initiated.

Exercise Therapy Teamwork in German Rehabilitation Settings: Results of a National Survey Using Mixed Methods Design.

A key prerequisite for implementing biopsychosocial exercise therapy concepts as parts of multimodal rehabilitation programs is interprofessional teamwork. Based on a nationwide survey of exercise therapy using a mixed methods design, it is of interest to determine to what extent there are links between team-related processes (e.g., interprofessional exchange) and structural features of the exercise therapy departments (e.g., department size) and the individual rating of interprofessional teamwork. The first part of the study involved a questionnaire-based survey, where exercise therapy heads of 1146 rehabilitation facilities were contacted. In the second part of the study, 58 exercise therapy heads held discussions in six focus groups. The results from both parts showed that interprofessional teamwork was rated positively overall. Team meetings were seen as the central platform for exchange. However, particularly in larger facilities, the hierarchical position of medical management and lacking resources were negatively associated with interprofessional exchange. The results affirm empirically that a more binding provision of adequate structural and organizational conditions, such as sufficient time slots for liaising on content, are essential for effective teamwork. This would facilitate and improve the promotion of physical activity in multimodal rehabilitation programs.

Physical activity promotion in daily exercise therapy: the perspectives of exercise therapists in German rehabilitation settings.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to explore exercise therapists' perspectives on the topic of physical activity promotion (PAP) with a focus on identifying (i) the intervention content and methodological approaches used for promoting physical activity (PA) in daily practice and (ii) the barriers and facilitators that affect PAP. METHODS: This qualitative study comprised the heads of exercise therapy departments (n = 58; 41% women; mean age = 45 years) from different rehabilitation clinics in Germany. Each participant took part in a semi-structured focus-group discussion on PAP in exercise therapy. The findings of the focus groups were processed and interpreted using a conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The exercise therapists demonstrated detailed didactic-methodological strategies and action orientations for PAP. The identified core topics of the content and methods of PAP were (1) conceptualization, (2) exercise and PA for enjoyment and pleasure, (3) education with practice-theory combinations, (4) media and materials for self-directed training, and (5) strategies to enhance personal responsibility and independence. The core topics for the associated barriers and facilitators were (1) structural conditions, (2) the role of exercise therapists, (3) the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team, (4) rehabilitant experiences and expectations, and (5) aftercare services. CONCLUSION: The topic of PAP is addressed with a high level of variability; exercise therapists involved in this study identify various methods and content for the promotion of PA within their individual practices. However, they display a limited awareness of existing evidence- and theory-based concepts for the promotion of PA as well as underlying theories of behavioural change. This variability may be due to the lack of a defined common framework for promoting PA, insufficient emphasis being placed on PA promotion in the current curricula and training, or extensive conceptual differences within German exercise therapy departments (e.g. different weighting of PAP).